Research & Analysis
A contract renews in six weeks and the comparison sheet has five vendors across the top and two columns filled in. You hand this agent the question instead. It reads the pricing pages, the policy documents, the review threads, and your own numbers, and comes back with a written answer. Every claim carries the link, the line it came from, and the date it was pulled. What it couldn't confirm is named at the top, not smoothed over.
Yours outright — no required subscription.
Every agent is built for your business — your systems, your approval chain, your way of working. We scope it on the call.
If this sounds too technical, don't worry. We take care of everything for you.
- Private VPS deployment. This agent runs on a server that belongs to you, not a shared cloud tenant. The reports it writes and the files it reads stay on your box.
- A technician agent alongside it. Every hire ships as a pair: the Research & Analysis Agent that works the question, and a VPS-technician agent that lives on the same box and keeps it healthy — patched, backed up, monitored. You're not hiring one thing, you're hiring a small team of two.
- An answer, not a pile of links. You give it the question in your own words. It comes back with a straight answer up front, the comparison or the working behind it, the source sitting inline with each claim, and a named list of what it could not confirm.
- Your own numbers in the same report. It reads the sheets and documents you point it at, so a vendor's published price can sit next to what you actually spent last year. The report says which figures came from you and which came from outside.
- A dated file that stays put. Each assignment lands as a report in a folder you choose, with the date on it. Six weeks later, when the number is already in a proposal and someone asks where it came from, that has an answer.
- Security hardening. Private VPN, firewall, and encryption configured on your server before it reads a single file of yours.
- You own everything — the server, the agent, the code it runs on, and every report it has written. We keep the recipe we used to cook it. Includes 14 days of priority support after launch, to tune it against the questions you actually ask.
Not sure it fits? Check fit in 90 seconds in the free assessment chat.
Who this is for
- You're a 25-person contractor with a software contract renewing in six weeks. The comparison sheet has five vendors across the top and two columns filled in, and the person who started it has a real job. You already know how this ends.
- You run a 12-person agency and a prospect asks in a pitch how you compare to the shop down the street. You answer from memory, because the last competitor teardown is fourteen months old and half its links are dead.
- You sell a few hundred items online and want to know which ones competitors are undercutting you on this month. Answering it means opening forty product pages and typing prices into a sheet, so it gets done once and never again.
- You're the owner of a 15-person firm and you are the only person who does research. Anything that requires digging waits for your weekend, which means most of it waits forever and the call gets made on instinct.
How it earns trust
The failure mode of AI in research isn't that it's sometimes wrong — everything is. It's that a fabricated number reads exactly like a checked one, in the same confident sentence. This agent is built around the opposite bet: every claim it makes is one click from the line it came from.
The source sits with the claim
Not a bibliography at the end — the link, the sentence the figure was pulled from, and the date the page was retrieved, right there under the claim. A price per user is followed by the line on the vendor's page that states it, and the day it said so.
Confidence is marked per claim, and the unconfirmed goes first
Each claim is tagged confirmed by a primary source, secondary only, or unconfirmed — and the unconfirmed items are listed at the top rather than buried, because what it couldn't nail down is usually what decides the question. Each report also says what it looked at and didn't use, so you can tell whether it missed the obvious source or checked it and had a reason.
Your numbers are traceable to the row
Anything drawn from your own files is labeled with the file, the tab, and the row range, plus the date pulled. So a figure from your books can be re-pulled by a human and checked against what the report claimed it said.
The practical check takes five minutes: pick any three figures in the report, click through, and read the quoted line on the page it came from.
Pairs well with
These share a workflow with this role. Tick any to add them to your setup.
I don't want something making numbers up at me.
That is the real risk, and the dangerous version isn't an obviously fake link — it's a real page that simply doesn't say the thing attributed to it. So every claim ships with the sentence it was pulled from, not just a source at the bottom. The check is five minutes: pick three figures, click through, read the line. If one doesn't hold up, you've learned something about the whole report, which is the point.
Every one of their pricing pages just says contact sales.
Then it will tell you that, rather than filling the cell with a number it found in a listicle. It gets you published list prices, contract terms, and what's actually documented, and it labels a list price as a list price — because the number that matters at your seat count usually lives behind a sales call. It will not fill out demo forms, email vendors, or pose as a buyer to get it. That part is still a phone call, and it's yours.
Where did that number even come from?
Every claim carries its link, the line it came from, and the date the page was retrieved. Figures pulled from your own files are labeled with the file, the tab, and the row range, plus the date pulled, so you can re-run the same pull and either get the same number or find out why you didn't. The report is a dated file that stays in a folder, so this is answerable six weeks later, not just the day it lands.
Can it just tell us which one to pick?
No. It gets you to the point where deciding is possible, which is usually the part that never happens — the decision, and the meeting where you announce it, stay yours. It also never writes into your systems of record; the output is a report in a folder, not an edit to your pricing sheet. And it isn't a substitute for licensed judgment: tax, legal, medical coding, insurance, and licensing questions still go to your CPA, attorney, or coder.
What happens on the 15-minute call?
It's the interview, not a sales pitch. We go through the kinds of questions you actually need answered, which of your files and systems it should be allowed to read, and where finished reports should land. You'll leave knowing exactly what gets built, and first delivery is typically about seven days from kickoff.
What's covered under the $1,997 setup, and what isn't?
One company, one system of record, one approval chain. Your existing process stays as it is — the agent adds a step, it never removes one. If you need it reading across several unrelated businesses or reporting into two different chains of command, that's a scoped conversation on the call, not a price adjustment.
Hiring more than one? A department on tap — the subscription puts a build team behind every request, agent after agent.