Social Media Scheduling
A 40-minute recording sits unwatched and a jobsite video sits on somebody's phone. This agent reads through the source, finds the parts worth saying in public, and writes them out channel by channel — long where long works, short where it doesn't, with the asset cropped to fit. Every draft waits in your queue until a person you name approves that specific post. It never publishes on its own.
Yours outright — no required subscription.
Every agent is built for your business — your systems, your approval chain, your way of working. We scope it on the call.
If this sounds too technical, don't worry. We take care of everything for you.
- Private VPS deployment. This agent runs on a server that belongs to you, not a shared cloud tenant. Private VPN, firewall, and encryption are configured on it before it touches a single recording of yours.
- A technician agent alongside it. Every hire ships as a pair: the Social Media Scheduling Agent that turns your source material into drafts, and a VPS-technician agent that lives on the same box and keeps it healthy — patched, backed up, monitored. You're not hiring one thing, you're hiring a small team of two.
- Connection to wherever your source material actually lands. Recordings, walkthrough videos, blog drafts — wired in from where they already sit, so nobody has to forward anything to get a week's worth of drafts started.
- Drafts written per channel, not one caption pasted three times. Each channel gets its own length, its own formatting, and its own crop of the asset. The idea is the same; the post isn't.
- Approval routed to the people who already sign off. The queue goes to your existing approver in the channel your team already uses, against a specific draft they can read on a phone between jobs. It adds a step to your process; it never removes one.
- 14 days of priority support after launch, to tune the voice against real drafts you approve and reject.
- You own everything — the server, the agent, the code it runs on.
Not sure it fits? Check fit in 90 seconds in the free assessment chat.
Who this is for
- You run a 20 to 40 person contracting or home services company. The owner films good before-and-afters on his phone and texts them to the office manager, who is also running scheduling and chasing receivables.
- You record everything — client calls, a podcast, internal teach-ins — and someone junior spends Friday scrubbing a 45-minute file for clips, which then sit in a doc waiting on a founder who never reads them.
- You're a clinic, a firm, or a brand where half the good material has a patient, a client, or somebody's face in frame, so what actually goes out is the safe stuff nobody remembers seeing.
- You've watched the account go dark for three weeks and then get four posts in one day, and you know the real reason is that posting was never anybody's actual job.
How it earns trust
The failure mode of AI in social isn't the caption that reads badly — you'd catch that one. It's the caption that reads well and rests on something nobody quite said. This agent is built on the opposite bet: every draft carries the source it came from, so you can check it before you approve it.
Every draft points back at a sentence
Each queued post is a row in your sheet with the source it came from and the timestamp or passage inside that source that produced it. Before you approve, you can jump from the caption back to the exact thing somebody actually said — and decide whether "same-day service" is a promise your business wants to make in public.
Approval has a name and a time on it
Sign-off happens against a specific draft, not a screenshot of the whole queue, and the row records who approved it and which slot it was scheduled into. A post that shouldn't have gone out has an answer to who said yes and what they were looking at when they said it.
The queue and the ledger have to match
Nothing should be scheduled that isn't a row in your sheet. Once a week you can put the two side by side: a scheduled post with no row, or a row marked approved that nobody remembers approving, is a real discrepancy pointing at a real problem. It takes about two minutes and you never open the agent to do it.
How much of a week one recording actually yields depends entirely on how much substance is in it, so we'll watch a real piece of yours on the call rather than promise a post count up front.
Pairs well with
These share a workflow with this role. Tick any to add them to your setup.
I don't want a bot posting as me. What won't it do?
It never publishes. Every draft stops in the queue until a named human approves that specific post, and there is no blanket auto-post switch turned on at setup. It never replies to comments, answers DMs, or responds to reviews — anything inbound stays with a person. It never spends money either: no boosting, no ad budget, and no changes to your account settings, passwords, bios, or connected profiles.
Whoever we had doing social just reposted other people's stuff. What does this actually work from?
Only what you hand it. It doesn't invent a stat, a credential, a guarantee, or a testimonial that wasn't in your source, and it won't build a post around a photo or clip that hasn't been marked cleared for public use — which is the only safe default when a patient, a client's property, or somebody's face is in frame. The honest limit is that it can't make a week interesting if the week wasn't. A rambling call with 90 seconds of substance produces drafts that say the same thing three ways.
We paid an agency for a stack of posts that didn't sound like us. Why is this different?
It might not sound like you at first either. First-pass voice reads competent and generic, and the first week is where people decide this isn't them. It gets closer during the 14-day window as you approve and reject real drafts, because those decisions are what it learns your voice from. If week one reads like every other company's feed, that's expected, and it's the part we tune.
Everything has to come through me and I'm the reason it doesn't go out.
Then the bottleneck moves, it doesn't disappear. What changes is what you're approving: a finished draft in the channel you already read, instead of a request for 20 minutes of your thinking. Approval is a yes or an edit on a specific post, with your name and the time recorded against it. Typically live in about seven days from kickoff.
Rewriting the same post for two channels is the part I actually hate.
That's the part it takes off you: one source in, a channel-shaped draft out for each place you post, with the asset cropped for each. One caveat worth knowing — platform mechanics drift. Character limits change, formats get reclassified, link previews render differently. Nothing announces that; the posts just get quietly worse, so it's worth a look every few months.
What's covered under the $1,997 setup, and what isn't?
One company, one system of record, one approval chain. Setup is scoped on a free 15-minute call where we look at a real recording of yours and what came out of it. If you're running several brands with genuinely different voices and separate approvers, that's a scoped conversation rather than a price adjustment.
Hiring more than one? A department on tap — the subscription puts a build team behind every request, agent after agent.